The Lost Boys


Action / Comedy / Fantasy / Horror

Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Certified Fresh 75%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 85%
IMDb Rating 7.3 10 118038

Please enable your VPN when downloading torrents

Get Free VPN


Uploaded By: OTTO
April 15, 2013 at 10:30 AM


Corey Feldman as Edgar Frog
Jami Gertz as Star
Corey Haim as Sam
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
755.93 MB
English 2.0
23.976 fps
1 hr 37 min
P/S 16 / 71
1.44 GB
English 2.0
23.976 fps
1 hr 37 min
P/S 7 / 64

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by matrsowner 10 / 10

Vampire Masterpiece

The Lost Boys couldn't be more 80s if it tried, but that's simply because that was when it was made. It's not corny or cliche, rather it's of its time and as cool as an 80s film can get. The bikes, the wardrobe, the soundtrack! All perfectly judged and executed.

Maybe one of the best vampire films ever made, with enough comedy elements to lift the entertainment, without diluting the story or the tension.

In case you haven't guessed, it's one of my favourites, that I've watched dozens of times since a child, and never tire of.

"You're a vampire Michael. You wait until mom hears about this!!"

Reviewed by Fluke_Skywalker 7 / 10

These Vampires don't suck!

Plot; A recently divorced Mother and her two Sons move to a small town where Vampires are more than just a myth.

Stylish and efficient aren't two words you often use together when describing a movie, but they certainly fit here. Another word that fits is fun. Oh it falls prey to a bit of 80ishness (I'm looking at you muscled up, heavily oiled saxophone player), but in my opinion it's all the better for it.

Featuring a top-notch cast and a killer, spot-on soundtrack, The Lost Boys may be about Vampires, but it certainly doesn't suck.

Reviewed by tstudstrup 3 / 10

Campy Vampy flick

Even though I was 13, when this movie came out in 1987, I haven't watched it until now, 30 years later and 30 years older.

I can forgive the cheesiness of Lost Boys, because it's meant to be a comedy. Although it's not very funny. Unlike the serious attempt at a vampire movie from the same year: Near Dark, this movie knows its bad and doesn't try to be anything else. That it's not complete amateur, is because it's produced by Richard Donner and directed by Joel Schumacher and has, later on major stars in it, like Kiefer Sutherland and Jason Patric.

What I cant forgive, however is that these vampires eat food and need light to see in the dark. Vampires are nocturnal creatures that only need to drink blood to stay "alive". And they have nightvision.

But I would have preferred a darker more serious vampire movie. Knowing what a great actor Kiefer is and how menacing he can be and was in Stand by me, that came out in 1986, a year before TLB I felt cheated here. Not to mention the fact that he wasn't in the movie nearly enough. But he was busy that year, also appearing in Young Guns, where he is much better. So it's not like he wasn't famous at the time.

Another actor that also appeared in Stand by me, was Corey Feldman. Like Kiefer he was also much better in Stand By Me.

The effects are bad, but could be much worse. At least they don't attempt to show the vampires flying.

There is a twist at the end of the movie that will be seen coming a mile away.

I would have loved this when it came out, but I guess I'm too old now. I love vampire movies, but I prefer the first Blade movie and the first two Underworld movies. If I'm gonna enjoy a vampire movie it has to be believable and dark and gory. Even though this is R- rated, there is very little blood and no swearing.

This was watchable but also forgettable.

Read more IMDb reviews


Be the first to leave a comment